Call of Duty fans are divided over the worthiness of the newer COD campaigns, especially amidst the ongoing controversies surrounding Activision. The discussion stems from a Reddit post questioning whether titles like Vanguard are worth the investment, with users offering mixed opinions.
Summary
- Opinions on the campaigns of newer COD titles vary, with some praising MW2019 and MW2022 for their fun despite flaws.
- Others feel that post-2012 COD entries, like MW2023, fail to live up to the franchise’s earlier standards.
- While some users appreciate the setting and gameplay of Cold War, MWIII receives negative feedback for its brevity.
Fan Feedback
JamesEvanBond shares positive experiences with MW2019 and MW2022 campaigns, highlighting the gameplay variety despite acknowledging flaws in the storytelling. He suggests getting the games at discounted prices for better value.
Bipolar0ctopus expresses enjoyment of the new MW’s graphics and engaging missions, considering purchasing newer installments when they are on sale, even though they are not typically drawn to campaign modes.
Mixed Reactions
No-Speaker-1534 criticizes the post-2012 COD titles, labeling them as inferior to earlier releases and mentioning the campaign’s reliance on Warzone mechanics. This user believes that the franchise peaked before 2012.
snakemuffins1880 highlights Cold War’s impressive campaign setting but mentions issues with voice acting. They express mixed feelings about Vanguard and outright dismiss MWIII for its short duration.
Final Verdict
TheRed24 keeps it brief with a simple ‘No,’ indicating a negative stance on the new COD campaigns.
