Navigating the grueling world of Clash Royale, one user, BunkumBox took to a popular online platform to seek an assessment for the level of toxicity in his original deck, eye-opening discussion ensued from the game’s community.
Summary
- BunkumBox has experimented with original decks, which led to a decreased score.
- Members of the Clash Royale community express concensus over the need for a win strategy in the deck.
- The deck’s perceived level of toxicity received mixed reviews, with some seeing it as moderate while others regarded it as high.
Analysis
Although BunkumBox doesn’t seem too bothered about the dip in his points after experimenting with decks, the need for a win strategy is a notable topic in the community. Player mike_yang18 highlights this by adviseing ‘You need a win con.’
The Cycle Issue
Another component that seems absent in this quirky deck is a cycle strategy. Player quinn21-coc hints that ‘any cycle deck and you are screwed’, suggesting that the deck may fall short against cyclically balanced alternatives.
Toxicity Ratings
The toxicity rating of BunkumBox’s Clash Royale deck had the community divided, with ratings varying widely. While some maintained a neutral outlook, others like Mushroome_dude, feels it scores high on the toxicity meter, describing it as ‘an awful deck… toxicity gets an 8’.
Throughout the discussions, there’s an evident need for balance and strategy. Despite its perceived toxicity, BunkumBox shows us that originality can spark conversation and potentially drive innovation in the world of Clash Royale.
