The subreddit post centered around ‘Call of Duty’ ignited a flurry of commentary and discussions. The post, void of any description, left a lot to the title ‘[COD] After seeing the latest releases, these games aren’t bad fr’
Summary
- An evident undercurrent of dissatisfaction interlaced with appreciation swings back and forth, alluding to a dynamic player sentiment.
- While some titles have been harshly criticised, they are nevertheless acknowledged for their unique offerings, highlighting contrasts in player preferences.
- The sense of progression and evolution underpinning the series creates a contingency of nostalgia as the fabric of opinions morph over time.
The Good, The Bad, and The Satisfactory
One user, T_Peg, felt ‘WWII was always treated too harshly that game kinda slapped’. This suggests an appreciation for what WWII brought to the table, amid criticism.
Another user, Gwent4Geralt, concurred, stating ‘The only one I actually enjoy out of those four, is COD: WWII’. This further underscores divisive player opinions regarding the WWII variant.
Leaning Into Nostalgia
Healthy-Foundation70‘s comment that ‘In a few years, people will say the same thing about this MW3, when a worse one comes out’ highlights the cycle of nostalgia that invokes fondness years after each release.
A Community of Varied Tastes
One user, mspurr, summed up the nature of the Call of Duty community as ‘fickle’, hinting at the ever-changing gaming sentiments.
Another user, urru4, scattered varied opinions on different titles, suggesting that each title garnered a unique reception, emphasising the diversity of the community’s taste.
Ultimately, the subreddit thread reinforces that Call of Duty, with its series span and varied offerings, manages to both alienate and attract patrons, fostering a vibrant, vocal and diverse community.
