Skull and Bones: Is the Flak Justified or Overblown?

Is the criticism surrounding Skull and Bones warranted? We dive into the Reddit discussions to find out.

Photo of author

Jarvis the NPC

Skull and Bones, the highly anticipated pirate-themed adventure game, has been receiving a lot of criticism recently. DeepfriedGrass, a self-proclaimed game enthusiast, took to the Skull and Bones subreddit to express their surprise at the negativity surrounding the game. They loved the beta and are excited for more, despite the mixed reactions from others. Let’s take a closer look at the Reddit post and comments to see if the flak is justified or overblown.

Summary:

  • Many players have expressed disappointment in the limited content and perceived shallowness of the game.
  • Others believe that there is a bias against Ubisoft and that people will complain regardless of the quality of their games.
  • Despite the negative reception, there are players who genuinely enjoyed the beta and are excited for the full release.
  • Some players compare Skull and Bones to other pirate-themed games, highlighting its unique qualities and solo-friendliness.

The Flak: Is it Justified?

Bagabeans, who had played the beta, acknowledges the fun they had but agrees with the criticism that the game feels shallow. They express concerns that the full release might not offer enough additional content to keep players engaged. However, their viewpoint is not entirely negative, as they mention enjoying certain aspects of the game, such as exploring the map and engaging in PvP battles.

–clapped– shares a different perspective, pointing out that regardless of what Ubisoft does, people will always find something to complain about. While not specifically defending Skull and Bones, they highlight the tendency for certain players to hate on Ubisoft’s games regardless of their quality.

On the other hand, Lost_In_Space__1, who hadn’t played the beta, reveals that they expected a worse reception based on what they had heard. Their comment suggests that not everyone is joining in on the wave of criticism.

The Game with Positive Reception

PankillerI expresses their confusion regarding the negative feedback, stating that they enjoyed the beta and are excited to play more. While acknowledging that it may not be on the same level as GTA 5, they still find Skull and Bones to be an enjoyable game.

UrWrstFear calls out the negativity surrounding the game, suggesting that those who criticize it do not fully understand the concept of a live service MMO. They find it absurd that people expect a wealth of content at release and criticize Skull and Bones for not meeting those unrealistic expectations.

Environmental_Park_6 highlights the subjective nature of video game enjoyment and dismisses negative reviews that lack specific justifications. They argue that well thought-out positive and negative reviews can help players find games they enjoy.

Unique Qualities of Skull and Bones

Random_Particle shares their favorite aspects of the game, such as the lack of a crew requirement, enjoyable ship battles, and the game’s solo-friendliness. They also discuss their preference for the cutscene-style boarding action, as it allows for faster-paced gameplay and avoids overwhelming players in combat situations.

It’s clear that while Skull and Bones has faced its fair share of criticism, there are players who enjoyed the beta and are excited for the full release. The limited content and perceived shallowness have been significant points of contention, but these criticisms are not without counterarguments. The game’s unique qualities, such as its solo-friendliness and enjoyable ship battles, have attracted positive attention from players.