Many fans debate whether the devs are obligated to complete the already decided roadmap despite financial losses. Some feel it’s essential for the game’s reputation, while others argue it’s their choice. Let’s dive into this heated discussion!
Summary
- Debate on completing the roadmap despite financial losses
- Implications for the game’s future and fanbase loyalty
- Arguments for and against continuing development
Narrow_Potential_974 Raises Concerns
Some users like joewickssgss_2 have already left the game due to ongoing development. They question if the devs were bound by contracts preventing them from shutting down.
RdJokr1993 on Game Continuation
RdJokr1993 notes the significance of upholding the game state for future releases, especially in relation to the Arkham series and potential live service games. A strategic move or a burden?
Batmanswrath Questions Live Service Terms
Batmanswrath discusses the terms and conditions of live service games, emphasizing the developer’s choice on the game’s fate, regardless of existing content or obligations.
Diamond_Champagne’s Contract Insight
Diamond_Champagne highlights the initial contract that marketed the game as a live service experience, shedding light on the devs’ obligations.
KommanderKrebs Potential Strategy
KommanderKrebs speculates on the devs’ strategy, suggesting potential player influx with strategic releases and summer sales, emphasizing gameplay value and pricing.
Username41968 points out the minimal financial commitment to complete existing content, indicating the feasibility of finishing the game despite current losses.
