Let’s dive into one passionate gamer, ThePikol’s head-scratching experience with ‘no’ votes in the popular video game, League of Legends. This gamer found himself in a 3v5 match as two teammates abruptly left. After calling for a surrender, he discovered a single ‘no’ vote suffices to stall the surrendering procedure.
Summary
- Intense feeling of being held hostage by the game’s mechanics is expressed by the original poster.
- The community shares their counter strategies and opinions on the voting system.
- Post sparks discussions revealing a divide in the community, further deep into arguments over game strategies and rules.
The ‘No’ Vote Paradox
It seems the crux lies in LoL’s voting system. As SuperKalkorat pointed out, the system calculates after each vote if 67% of the team wants to surrender. A ‘no’ vote from one of the three players checks off as insufficient to reach that 67%, effectively ending the vote.
A Hostage Situation?
User ThePikol not-so-quietly rages at this predicament, describing it as being held hostage by the game’s mechanics. He’s not alone in this sentiment. However, other gamers offer radical solutions. natt1000 suggests to start ‘soft inting’ – a tactic that contains subtlety, malice, and surprise all at once!
The Art of Waiting
Then, there are those who offer more diplomatic solutions. throwaway4598384 chimes in with a laid-back perspective, advising just to wait it out at the base while the opposing team finishes the game. Now that’s what I call a virtual zen!
It’s clear the community is divided. Those against the no-vote rule argue about player freedom, whereas others see it as an opportunity to master advanced tactics. Rest assured, League of Legends offers enough room to accommodate a variety of play styles and strategies, even in such a contested scenario. After all, if games didn’t challenge the players, where would the fun be?
